Skip to main content

Sermon Prep Rev 3:1-6 Part II

Ok, sermon organization. Which is better than blog organization, because you can always sort and go back and forth through a blog. When you're preaching, you have to go through it once, get it right, and trust it to stick.

So, how to organize? Well, typically, I preach through things verse by verse. So, there's a natural organization there. If it's a single verse, I might go phrase by phrase. This week, I'm seeing the text support a recurrent theme. As such, I'll make an outline based on that theme, with the points I intend to make.

Note that while some preachers start with the points they want to make, and then find the verses to support them, that's not what we're doing here. What I'm looking at is how the text supports certain points, and building the sermon around them.

What are the points? I'm seeing a recurrent theme of "names" in this passage. Well, mostly. There's a minor problem. I mainly use the NASB, which uses 'name' in Rev. 3:1 and Rev. 3:5 but uses 'people' in Rev. 3:4 where there is a footnote showing that 'people' is literally 'names.' ESV uses 'reputation' Rev. 3:1 ESV and uses 'names' and 'name' in the other two verses. So, my English work leads me to think that John wove the term 'name' through the passage, which means the Lord used it 3 times in His message to Sardis. Which would make it important.

But, what about the disparity between what I think and what NASB, NLT, and ESV show? That's why preachers should be doing their best to learn Greek and Hebrew. Greek I'm ok with, if I've got time to be slow. Hebrew, not so much. Looking at the old Greek NT from OBU days, I see that 'onoma' 'onomata' and 'onoma' are the 3 words in question. I'm fairly certain 'onoma(t)' is a 3rd declension noun, which loses the (t) when there's no ending, and the (a) after the (t) shows plurality. So, 'onama' is the singular, 'onamata' is the plural, and it's the same word. Good, so far I'm apparently right.

Why are the words different in the English? Remember, languages aren't codes, you have to match ranges of meaning. In the culture that Greek served as a language, 'onoma(t)' was more than just your legal designator. It was what you were called, but also was your reputation. Just like we say things today like 'Make a name for yourself,' and we don't mean for you to change your driver's license. So, to try and make clear what the apparent intention is, reputation is used to translate 'onoma(t)' from time to time. NASB's use of 'people' conforms to the use of 'onomata' to designate a group, albeit a specific group, not a generic group. 'Onomata' can be used of a group that is of a known (to the speaker/writer) size and make-up, as the speaker/writer has a list of members. For example, the band Third Day is 'onomata' because there are specific people that are that group. Third Day fans, however, is an undefiniable group. A group you should join.

Back to the sermon: here's the points I'm seeing:

Point 1: A worthless name: Rev. 3:1 The people have a worthless name (reputation) for being alive. It's worthless because it's not true. They're dead. There are many people that you look at and think they are living a wonderful life. And in fact, they aren't. Dead inside, their name is false.

Point 2: A worthy name: Rev. 3:4 There are some in the church whose names are worthy. These are the ones who are striving to follow Christ. They will walk with Him.

Point 3: A written name: Rev. 3:5 Those who follow Christ will have their names found written in the Book of Life. These names will also be confessed, admitted to, in the presence of God. Matthew 10:32 is on point, as is Luke 12:8 so the surrounding passages about obedience to the commands of the Lord.

What is your name? Do you have a worthless name, a worthy name? A worthy name that endures is a written name. I think that perhaps we see that some live godly lives, and their name becomes permanent with their commitment to Christ.

Ok, there's the basic outline of this sermon. I'll take that outline, and preach from it. The printout I'll use will have those 3 points, any specific illustrations that I intend to use.

Last thing to look at:
Difficulties in the text.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Book: Vindicating the Vixens

Well, if Vindicating the Vixens doesn’t catch your attention as a book title, I’m not sure what would. This volume, edited by Sandra L. Glahn (PhD), provides a look at some of the women of the Bible who are “Sexualized, Vilified, and Marginalized.” As is frequently the case, I was sent a copy of this book in exchange for my review.Let’s take this a stage at a time. First stage: book setup. This is primarily an academic Biblical Studies book. Be prepared to see discussions of Greek and Hebrew words, as appropriate. You’ll also need a handle on the general flow of Biblical narrative, a willingness to look around at history, and the other tools of someone who is truly studying the text. This is no one-day read. It’s a serious study of women in the Bible, specifically those who either faced sexual violence or who have been considered sexually ‘wrong’ across years of study.A quick note: this book is timely, not opportunistic. The length of time to plan, assign, develop, and publish a multi…