Skip to main content

Book review links

I want to take a minute and post links to two book reviews. One is an excellent review of a book I intend to buy, read, make notes on and require any body under the age of 25 that comes to me for pre-marital guidance (which is a must if you want my signature on the marriage license. It's a license to be married, not to be wed. I can't sign it if I have no clue if you have any clue what it is to be married).

This book is What He Must Be....if He Wants to Marry My Daughter by Voddie Baucham.

Here's the link to Frank Turk's review (Frank goes by the name Centurion on TeamPyro, a blog I readily endorse.) If you've got time to spend on the internet, read Pyro. If you are a comic collector, check out Frank Turk's own blog/hobby shop.

Why will I endorse a book I haven't read? Because I've heard Dr. Baucham preach, I've heard him teach academically, I've read his blog, I've met the man (not that he will remember me), and greatly respect his work and Biblical viewpoint. He has two other books, Family Driven Faith and The Ever-loving Truth. All of these books are worth your time and money.

How much do I respect Voddie Baucham? If I looked up and saw him walk in during one of my sermons, I would hand him the microphone and sit down. He can preach more in 10 minutes than I can in a month. Is he human and fallible? Yes, but he also sets an excellent standard of being Biblical, no matter the cost.

On the subject of being Biblical, I'd like to link you to a review of a book that you should NOTwaste your time, money, or brain cells on. It's from Tim Challies, a well-known (in the internet world) blogger on Christian subjects. This is his review of The Shack by William P. Young. Now, he has a longer review that spells out more details, and I'll email it to you (or you can download it yourself).

Why do I side with Challies on this book? Well, here's why: there is a great tendency in American Christianity today to 'fluff' out the Gospel and God's expectations on His people. We are, rightly, concerned about taking the message of Christ and God's love to people around us. Unfortunately, we have allowed how the world responds to God to be our definition of success. As such, we water down hard truths, we push God's love as greater than His holiness, we try to project God as being whatever we need to see in order to understand Him.

Instead, we need to recognize that God has revealed Himself to the world in certain ways. One is as a righteous, jealous, holy, loving, all-powerful God who created the universe. The other is as the righteous, jealous, holy, loving, all-powerful God who created the universe. Our definition of success cannot be based solely on how the world responds. Our success is measured in our faithfulness to God's revelation of Himself. I don't think you find that in The Shack. I think you find an Americanized representation of what we'd like God to be, rather than what God has said He is.

To some, the book 'feels good' or 'was life-changing.' Eating a McDonalds double cheeseburger feels good, but that's not real nourishment. Shooting myself in the foot is life-changing. It's not healthy.

God reveals all of Himself through Scripture. Have you given the Bible as close of a reading as The Shack?

In truth, for the believer in Christ, nothing should have the importance that the Word of God has. Are other writings helpful? Yes, but anything that supposedly exists to help us grow in Christ should be based on Scripture, and not conflict with it. Neither should those writings try and take the place of Scripture.

So, why would I recommend, require if possible the first book? Because it's a compilation of what the Bible actually teaches. If you were to show me that you had read and comprehended what the Bible teaches about marriage and manhood, I'd let you out of reading What He Must Be.

Why would I recommend skipping the second book? Because it claims to teach about God without needing the Bible at all, that God is to be found more in your personal experience and how you want to see Him than in His own revelation. Why bother? If the author of The Shack is right, than his book is a waste of time. Experience God in your way, your own life however you want. If he's wrong, than the book is heretical, and you should read your Bible instead.


  1. "Because it claims to teach about God without needing the Bible at all, that God is to be found more in your personal experience and how you want to see Him than in His own revelation."


    That is a great distillation (is that a word?) of the sad state of much Christian thought today.


Post a Comment

To deal with SPAM comments, all comments are moderated. I'm typically willing to post contrary views...but I also only check the list once a day, so if you posted within the last 24 hours, I may not be to it yet.

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.

First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Foolishness: 1 Corinthians 1

In Summary: 1 Corinthians opens with the standard greeting of a letter from the Apostle Paul. He tells who he is with (Sosthenes) and who he is writing to. In this case, that is the “church of God that is in Corinth.” He further specifies that this church is made up of those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be saints. 
He then expresses the blessing/greeting of “grace and peace” from God. From there, Paul reflects on his initial involvement with the Corinthian people and the beginning of the church. After that, though, there are problems to deal with and Paul is not hesitant to address them. He begins by addressing the division within the church. Apparently, the church had split into factions, some of which were drawn to various personalities who had led the church in times past. There is no firm evidence, or even a suggestion, that Paul, Cephas, Apollos, or anyone else had asked for a faction in their name. Further, the “I follow Christ” faction may not have been any le…