Skip to main content

The most ignored Amendment in the Constitution...

It's not the 1st Amendment. That's the most abused.

It's not the 2nd Amendment. That's the most attacked.

It's the 10th Amendment. The one that says:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

It is time that we remind the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches of the Federal Government of this Amendment. There is too much interference from Washington, D.C. in the rights of the people and the states they dwell in. Why is this important? Because the full-time Congress in D.C. is excessively insulated from their own actions. Remember the House Banking scandal a few years ago? The US House had a bank, issued checking accounts to Congressmen and Congresswomen, some of whom promptly overdrew their accounts, and were then forgiven by the bank. How many people have banks that will do that when you start writing bad checks? To the tune of $1000s of dollars? Haven't you seen the stickers in businesses 'We prosecute bad checks?' If I went down the street, wrote a check for $1000 I didn't have, the bank wouldn't pay it, the business would try to collect, and if they couldn't, I'd go to jail! Not Congress.


We need to return much of the business of day to day governing back to the states. The Federal Government is responsible to provide for common defense, but only to promote the general welfare. States should run their own programs designed to provide, internal to those states, their own programs for general welfare, such as health care for the poor, education, unemployment, and human services. The reduction of federal spending and taxation would allow for people to afford a higher state-level of taxation (many federal tax dollars are turned back to states to run these programs anyway. There's just an extra level of bureaucracy.) This state taxation would be directed by the members of state legislatures, who represent smaller portions of the population, and are therefore more accountable.

Read further posts to see more details. We're going to spend 4 years establishing more than just buzzwords and soundbites, but coming up with real, practical plans. It might mean scrapping many things, but it can be done!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…