Skip to main content

January 7, 2014: Proverbs 7

In focus today, let us take a look at Proverbs 7:11. This verse illustrates one of the most critical aspects of studying the Bible, so I want you to read that verse. Just that verse.

 

Got it?

 

Ready to think about it?

 

The verse defines an unnamed “she” as being rebellious and troublesome, and that she does not stay at home makes it even worse.

 

Ah, wait, you say, let us consider the context! That is certainly the first step in the process. Proverbs 7 is presenting a warning about the wiles of the harlot, or the dangers of foreign women, depending on your translation philosophy. I would present this chapter as warning about becoming intimately, in several connotations, involved with those who practice faith foreign to yours.

 

So, then, those women who are unwilling to stay home, those are the ones to avoid?

 

Nonsense.

 

This is an exercise in learning to read the context and the idea presented in the passage. Some folks would argue that understanding what is meant means you are not taking the Bible literally—that is not the case. If you force a foolish literality on the text, you miss what is really there.

 

Now, the word choices and the context still drive the meaning. The text does not mean a thousand different things to a thousand different people. It means one thing, and may apply differently.

 

How do we arrive that meaning? How do we understand?

 

The first challenge is understanding the words and phrases in the verse. Then we try to understand the context of the verses around the one in question, and then understanding the concept of the entire book. All the while, there is a need to grasp the background of the entire Bible as you consider.

 

So, what about Proverbs 7:11?

 

One marker of the dangerous woman, or the dangerous man, is their unsettled nature. They are unable to be satisfied. It is not that one should never leave the house—nor that being noisy is necessarily bad.

 

Solomon is not cautioning his son that he must have a stay-at-home-all-the-time-wife. While I count my beloved’s opportunity to work from home, teach at home, and be at home a blessing, that is one way to be a God-honoring wife. Not the only way. (Considering she has worked out of the home full-time and part-time in our marriage, that should be obvious I feel that way, but…)

 

He is warning him about a critical reality we still see people miss: those who are dissatisfied with their current life are not likely to be satisfied with you, either. They are just getting a fix.

 

How often do we see it? Husband has an affair, ditches his wife, marries his lover—and then they get divorced due to unfaithfulness? Woman marries a man, longing for him to be more like a different man, and then is constantly annoyed that he is…himself.

 

This passage is part of an overall description of a person. Not a command to absolutely not do anything on the list. Rather, if you see someone that fits this description, be wary! Be concerned.

 

Not someone who does not fit one phrase of it. Let’s stop being silly with our study of Scripture, either in our teaching of it or our critique. This verse does not command women must stay at home and be silent--

 

And clear study reveals that. Wisdom pays attention.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.



First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Foolishness: 1 Corinthians 1

In Summary: 1 Corinthians opens with the standard greeting of a letter from the Apostle Paul. He tells who he is with (Sosthenes) and who he is writing to. In this case, that is the “church of God that is in Corinth.” He further specifies that this church is made up of those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be saints. 
He then expresses the blessing/greeting of “grace and peace” from God. From there, Paul reflects on his initial involvement with the Corinthian people and the beginning of the church. After that, though, there are problems to deal with and Paul is not hesitant to address them. He begins by addressing the division within the church. Apparently, the church had split into factions, some of which were drawn to various personalities who had led the church in times past. There is no firm evidence, or even a suggestion, that Paul, Cephas, Apollos, or anyone else had asked for a faction in their name. Further, the “I follow Christ” faction may not have been any le…