Skip to main content

Book: A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers

Today’s Book is a Greek Lexicon, provided by Kregel Academic.

Unlike my review last week for Rest Not in Peace, this is not a book that I would recommend for nearly everyone. It’s a Greek book, so if you’re not Greek-nerdy, you might just move on. Unless you know a Greek-nerd person, and need a gift idea.

Today, let us look at A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers. This is not really a book that you simply sit down and read. This is, instead, a companion for reading The Apostolic Fathers, and one nice thing from the get-go is that it is connected to the Baker Publishing version. Kregel Academic has not spent the effort to sell their own version, and instead has focused the effort on making the Fathers more accessible.

Now, I should spend some time pointing out why you should read the Apostolic Fathers, so that you understand your need for A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers. After all, if you don’t intend to read a book, you hardly need a specialized dictionary for it, do you?

Here’s why you should read the Fathers: Christianity is not a new faith. It has existed for nearly 2 millennia, and pending eschatological fulfillment, will exist for many more. The Fathers are those who wrote and taught roughly in the first generation after the Apostles. These are the first writings that are remembered by the Church at large and found useful, just not inspired. If you would suggest that the Federalist Papers help us understand the Constitution of the United States, or that post-episode blog posts help us understand TV series, then you get the concept. Just amplify the idea.

Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp all provide us with good insight into how the basics of doctrine were understood in the early church. While they have not written inspired Scripture, they have written helpful material. If you are a serious student of the New Testament Church or the history of Christianity, you need to read the Fathers.

The standard street version of the Fathers is presented in a diglot version with both Greek and English, so it is accessible to anyone. However, a better understanding comes from the Greek text. This is the value of A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers.

How so? Typically, students of the New Testament have learned the grammar of Koine Greek and have learned vocabulary words that occur above a certain frequency in the New Testament. (My classes show I learned to a count of 20, but I’m more comfortable above 30.) The Apostolic Fathers, though, used a slightly different vocabulary in general than the New Testament authors. So, some words are far more prevalent in the New Testament, others more prevalent in the Fathers, and the vocabulary gap can intimidate a reader.

Wallace and his team in A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers have taken the time to index all of the vocabulary of The Apostolic Fathers, 3rd edition by Holmes, and provided a lexicon with all those words that occur fewer than 30 times in the New Testament. These are then presented in the order they appear in each individual work of the Fathers, so some words are repeated from Clement to Ignatius to Papias, while others are only referenced in one work.

The format is simple. A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers is a hardcover, 7x10 book of 256 pages. There is an introduction, and then the lexical work. A lexicon is simply a specialized dictionary, and in this case, it is a Greek-English dictionary. Each Patristic writing (Patristic=from the Fathers) is taken in printed order, and the words are presented as you will encounter them in reading.

A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers does not provide full definition. You’ll want BAGD for that, but Wallace, et. al, have provided frequency counts alongside the simple glosses in the text. These handy definitions are chosen based on context, but the reader can easily cross-reference to a reference work for certainty.

Additionally, one finds that A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers looks like it matches A New Reader’s Lexicon of the Greek New Testament. That’s intentional—these are part of a planned series, and both are almost indispensible for the pastor, teacher, or student who is not able to memorize the entire Koine Greek language.

A Reader’s Lexicon of the Apostolic Fathers is highly recommended to you as a student of the New Testament. If you would like more information, I commend to you the Author Talks Podcast with Daniel Wallace found here: http://biblegeekgonewild.com/2014/01/03/author-talks-with-shaun-tabatt-episode-71-daniel-b-wallace-a-readers-lexicon-of-the-apostolic-fathers/

Today’s Book was provided by Kregel Academic publishers, who also produce the Philips Commentary Series and the New Reader’s Lexicon of the Greek New Testament mentioned above.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…