Skip to main content

Spurgeon on discernment

“Discernment is not simply a matter of telling the difference between what is right and wrong; rather it is the difference between right and almost right.” -Charles Spurgeon


This is where our problems come from in the church. It's the Scripture twisting, minor shading that has gotten us to the point of irrelevancy. We allow people to take portions of Scripture, and exalt them to the expense of others. God is love, but God is also just, God is vengeful, but also merciful. Jesus was not just a community helper, but the Son of God, who got angry, demanded righteousness, and helped the poor.

We need the whole of Scripture to strengthen our discernment. May we have it this year!


Comments

  1. Protestants! Catholics don't have this problem - we've got the magisterium (sp?) to carry forth the apostle's explanation of scripture through the ages. That's their job - to make sure that the words of Jesus and the aposotles are carried faithfully forth from age to age. Traditions too. :) So, when we want to know what scripture is saying, we can open the Catechism and there is the explanation. It fairly rocks!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point....of course, one could argue whether or not the RCC has been effective in that responsibility. Which, of course, is what we protested about in the first place. Could lead to lots of circling arguments, couldn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cutseox
    Oh yes. Because Lord knows there was no division in the Roman Catholic Church prior to the reformation. Lord knows that Christianity was in perfect harmony before the reformation. Oh wait, I seem to remember hearing about a certain Greek church and a certain coptic church.

    And of course there is no scripture twisting going in the RCC today. I mean after all, Father Micael Manning and Jermiah Wright's buddy Father Pflaeger are both just founts of orthodoxy aren't they?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Truth is, I think we should see a unified Church following Christ. But, given mankind's sinful nature, I don't think we'll ever get there. I'm sure some of my Baptist brethren will form a committee to verify the second coming of the Lord Himself. And probably won't even allow Him to vote on that committee.

    So, the RCC tries to interpret for their people, we Protestants interpret for ourselves, and the world gets to snipe at us while we do it. As long as we have sinful people in the churches, we'll have issues within the church.

    Personally, I find Scripture makes me responsible for understanding and following God's Word, and doesn't allow me to pass that off to any form of church hierarchy or structure. I think this is the most Biblical. Catholics find the Apostles have passed on authority, which is what most Charismatics think, but you can't get them together, can you? So, what do we do? Follow as best we can. If we can't work with each other because of those differences, then pray for each other to get right, and trust God to deal with all of you who are wrong :) or with me too.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

To deal with SPAM comments, all comments are moderated. I'm typically willing to post contrary views...but I also only check the list once a day, so if you posted within the last 24 hours, I may not be to it yet.

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.



First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Foolishness: 1 Corinthians 1

In Summary: 1 Corinthians opens with the standard greeting of a letter from the Apostle Paul. He tells who he is with (Sosthenes) and who he is writing to. In this case, that is the “church of God that is in Corinth.” He further specifies that this church is made up of those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be saints. 
He then expresses the blessing/greeting of “grace and peace” from God. From there, Paul reflects on his initial involvement with the Corinthian people and the beginning of the church. After that, though, there are problems to deal with and Paul is not hesitant to address them. He begins by addressing the division within the church. Apparently, the church had split into factions, some of which were drawn to various personalities who had led the church in times past. There is no firm evidence, or even a suggestion, that Paul, Cephas, Apollos, or anyone else had asked for a faction in their name. Further, the “I follow Christ” faction may not have been any le…