Skip to main content

Book Review: Nelson's Illustrated Guide to Religions



As I've noted here before, I get the opportunity to review books for Thomas Nelson Publishers. They send me a book, I read it, review it, and get to keep it for free. They ask for honesty, which they get from me, even though I do rate most of the books fairly highly. Why? Well, they don't just send me random books. I get to pick the books I want, so I have a prior interest, plus, these are books that have already been considered, vetted, edited, rewritten, and so on. Between getting books I want and the process, I don't hit many books I don't like. But, there might be first one.

Ok, so the book is: Nelson's Illustrated Guide to Religions: A Comprehensive Introduction to the Religions of the World. The author is James A. Beverley, who is Professor of Christian Thought and Ethics at Tyndale Seminary.

So, let's look at this book. I've done it in a question/answer format, using questions I consider when buying a reference work:

First question: Is the author qualified to write a resource book like this?

Generally, when I look at a resource or reference book, I want to know if the author is qualified. I could write a reference of religions, but my experience and world involvement is pretty sparse. Dr. Beverley, however, has been doing academic study of world religions for 3 decades. Moreover, he's taught classes on 6 of the 7 continents, and no major world religions are based on Antarctica, which he's missed so far. So, he's read the books, he's studied the material, and he's seen the places where things generally happen. So, author qualification is there.

Second question: How well does the author handle author bias in the book?

In the introduction, Dr. Beverley is up front with his primary bias in favor of Evangelical Christianity. He allows the reader to know that he is examining all of these religions in light of their truth claims and history, and that his starting point is the truth of Christianity. Some might prefer a book that claims to be completely unbiased, but that's a logical impossibility. Everyone has some assumptions and biases about what is true and what isn't, the author does the reader a service by disclosing his biases.

Secondly on this question, the author does not, as some Christian guides to world religions do, present each religion as a list of errors compared to Christianity, nor does he list a tips for evangelism section on each group. He does provide links to both official sources and known critical sources on each group.

Third question: Is the material presented in an accessible fashion?

I'd give the setup and design of this book a resounding endorsement. The use of full-color photographs and charts is easy on the eyes, and brings a realism to the understanding. Moreover, the division of the book into major sections that are similar, with individual groups detailed in each section, is very helpful. The book uses colored charts to summarize information on each group, so there is no risk of accidentally reading into another section without knowing it.

All in all, I found Dr. Beverley's work satisfying, and will use it as a lending resource for church members with questions about other religions.

I review for Thomas Nelson Book Review Bloggers

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.



First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…