Skip to main content

Book: Know the Heretics

A week ago, we looked Know the Creeds and Councils by Justin Holcomb. Released at the same time, Know the Heretics is the obvious companion volume to that first work.

Historically speaking, one finds that the creeds were often formulated by the councils in response to the heretics, after all. You can’t study them independently and get the full picture.

Holcomb’s Know the Heretics is focused on the troubles of the initial centuries of Christianity, though he pulls one heretic from the late Middle Ages. In doing so, he is cautiously avoiding labeling any major modern Christian group as heretical. There are, after all, some who would lob that title about over something as trivial as whether or not the church takes an offering. Just check the blog-argument-zone for that behavior.

By focusing on these early heretics, Holcomb aids the reader in seeing how the church responded to the various pressures. The greatest threats were not the outside, but misunderstandings within, and often these were ideas that were *almost* right.

Certainly the most helpful segment of Holcomb’s work here is the chapter defining what heresy is and isn’t. This serves as a valuable corrective to today’s rapid tossing about of the term “heresy” for any old error. I find his view in line with mine expressed here.

There is a typo/editing error on page 24, but the context makes clear what Holcomb intended. The bigger problem with the text is this: ENDNOTES. Please, Zondervan, make it stop. You’ve got a lovely explanatory note for page 96 on page 171. I’m reading to learn, not to have perfectly clean lines. And you’re laying it out on a screen, not a printing press.

All-in-all, I wouldn’t recommend this for stand alone study like I would the co-volume of Know the Creeds and Councils. Rather, I would suggest this as supplemental material as you study church history and the early church. Why? Focusing on the errors, even with providing who the primary defenders of orthodoxy were and the right answers just feels a bit off for a specific study. Instead, this makes a great reference work.

And I look forward to the deluxe hardcover edition of Know the Creeds, Councils, and Heretics that combines all this information. Especially if they let it come forth with footnotes.

Free book from Zondervan, which saved me the purchase of a book I wanted. No requirements were made on the content of the review beyond word count.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…