Skip to main content

Left the Gospel: Galatians 1

In Summary: We move on from John—having finished his Gospel, I needed another place to go. I have chosen Galatians as the next New Testament book for the Through the Whole Bible series here on Learning, Teaching, and Laughing. If you don’t like Galatians, stick around! It’s a short book.

Galatians 1 opens with the standard Pauline greeting, establishing his identity, his companions, and his audience. He goes on to present a fairly normal greeting in the form of a blessing. It is a worthy exercise to compare all of the Pauline introductions in his letters, but I will not delve into that today.

The first chapter of Galatians is split between two major themes. The first theme is Paul’s frustrated amazement at how readily the Galatian churches had slid away from the Gospel. The second is Paul’s effort to demonstrate why his Gospel, his preaching, was what they should listen to.

This is the summary section, so this is the high point: the Gospel is the Gospel, and it does not change. Paul did not learn it from any earthly teacher but from God, and the Galatians need to not chase the latest winds of change that come to visit.
In Focus: Take a long, hard look at Galatians 1:6-8. Paul is astounded at the rapid departure from the truth in the church. It appears that some men had come in to the church and taught them something other than the True Gospel of Jesus.

We see several rebukes in the rest of Galatians which give us clues about who and what the problem was. It looks like it was the legalistic teaching we now call Judaizing, that is teaching that to be a good Christian, one had to obey all the Jewish Law first. (Whole books exist on the subject of this legalistic heresy, so that’s a real oversimplification.)

This false teaching was presented by people who sounded good, looked good, and preached good. Yet they were destroying the church. And there is one another issue to truly note:

Galatia’s not a town. It’s a region. This is not one church, it’s several. Rather than being self-correcting interdependent bodies, these churches had all fallen for the false teaching. We may hope there were individual holdouts, but the churches as a whole had become corrupt.
In Practice: What do we do about it? Here are three actions:

1. Know and hold the True Gospel: the grace of God, through the Blood of Christ, sealed by the Holy Spirit. That is how salvation comes, and how a relationship with God begins. If someone starts adding to that with rules, they are rejecting the Gospel. If someone starts taking away from that by, for instance, denying Jesus’ bodily resurrection, then they are rejecting the Gospel.

Reject that teaching in your life and church. Reject that person as a teacher.

2. Be wary of the fads and whims. We are so prone to this it’s almost not funny. Here is the latest and greatest…no, there is the latest and greatest. The core of who we are as Christians has not changed since Pentecost.

Reject the fallacy that old ideas must be discarded. The oldest and best must be maintained—for the Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world.

3. No amount of personal charisma or perspective should draw a church from the Truth to another person. This is Paul’s plea about letting the one who draws the church away be “accursed.”

If an individual demands that the church be about him (or her) and not about Jesus, then they need to be cut out.

For further info: I have preached some of Galatians before. Here are the posts with those sermons.
In Nerdiness: Galatians is a fun book to take apart nerd-style, because it starts with a great mystery: Which Galatia?

At various times, Galatia was a region that was larger or smaller, generally in what is now Turkey. There are theories on whether Galatians is targeted at North Galatia or South Galatia—the mountainous region or the coastal one. I’m inclined toward the South Galatia view, but uncertain about it.

The other great question in chapter one is where all Paul went after his salvation, especially the three years in Galatians 1:17-18. Is he in Arabia the whole time, or just not in Jerusalem? There is much debating there as well.

I am a big fan of digging into these questions, but do not lose sight of Galatians 1:24: if people are not glorifying God because of you, no nerdiness is enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…