Skip to main content

Book: The Traitor’s Heir

Today’s book was provided through Kregel Publishing on behalf of LionHudson Fiction. No money changed hands in the process, nor is there an expectation that my review will be anything but honest.

Image

The cover of Anna Thayer’s The Traitor’s Heir looks like this:

Inside, of course, it looks like letters on a page.

The Traitor’s Heir is the debut novel from Anna Thayer, who is both an English teacher and a lecturer in the works of both C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien. She’s no stranger to fantasy worlds, and has created her own here.

The world she has created centers on The River Realm, and we explore it through the life of Eamon Goodman. This world holds both magic and intrigue, though perhaps “magic” isn’t quite the right term. It would be more accurate to say that there is a more open metaphysical realm in this world than in our own.

At issue within the River Realm is this question: Who should be the ruler? Is it the Master? Is it someone else? And how does one tell the difference between power used of necessity and power abused of excess?

It’s not nearly as simple as the good guys in bright colors and bad guys in plaid. There are questions of loyalty, and the issue of whether or not someone can be honorable while serving the wrong side.

Plot pacing flows well through The Traitor’s Heir, and there is backstory aplenty for both Goodman and the whole realm. The characters are mostly fleshed out, with a few obvious gaps left for the further portions of the series.

Overall, I’d put this at a good read from high school on up. Content is very direct with warfare and violence, but not overly gruesome. It’s a good read, and a great start for a series I look forward to finishing.

Free book in exchange for the review.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…