Skip to main content

Be Sensible! Proverbs 14:15 for May 2014

Today, we turn to Proverbs 14, specifically Proverbs 14:15. Here we find a contrast between naiveté and sensibility. This is different from the usually contrasts in Proverbs which fall between the righteous and the wicked. Instead, we see a contrast between one who has learned to pay attention, and the one blundering through life.

Naive, or simple, in the context of Proverbs refers to those folks who are essentially blundering through life. It is the natural, original status of man and the Proverbs are written to help us rise above that status (Proverbs 1:4). In fact, the testimony of YHWH is provided to make the naive into the wise (Psalm 19:7), capturing one of the purposes for God’s Word in our lives.

There is no fault found with the naive in Proverbs until they choose naiveté over wisdom. As parents should recognize, there are times people make mistakes in ignorance and innocence. Consequences remain, but the willfulness of the heart matters here—while the naive person needs to learn, they do not earn the punishment of fools.

Sensible people are contrasted with the naive here. The sensible person is perhaps not quite wise, but has begun the process of learning and growing. This man may not be wise, but he is working on it. Further, “wise” in Proverbs carries a definite moral connotation of following YHWH well. The sensible person may not be there, spiritually, but is still working toward it.

This contrast, then, is not as strongly about spiritual and moral character as it is about old-fashioned horse sense. The naive and sensible can be assumed to intend to do right in the eyes of God, otherwise they would be recorded as fools, but here they illustrate how intentions are not all that matters.

The indicator of naiveté is the one who believes everything. You know a few naive people, especially on the Internet. They repeat everything that comes into their inbox: that the fish are toxic, the Republicans are out to rule us all, the Democrats are out to tax us to death, everybody wants a gun, everybody wants to take our guns away, and so forth.

That is not to say there is not a kernel of truth at the heart of many rumors, but the naive believe every last bit of it. They not only believe that man has an impact on the environment, but that specifically only white men in SUVs are killing us all. Or not only do they believe that President Obama ignored Benghazi and tried to use it for his own political purposes, but that it’s all part of a long-running plot, devised by him, while he was an elementary student in a Muslim school.

The naive are the people who were on the Atkins diet, binging on meat and avoiding all bread, right up until they shifted immediately to a vegan diet. Then they’ll shift and condemn the vegans as they have the meat-eaters. The willingness to blow about without an anchor is a mark of naiveté.

Sensible people, in contrast, think through things. They may be slower to engage, but they are more durable in the end. The sensible person knows that the thoughts of man are only evil all the time (Genesis 6) and so trusts no governing officials. Sensible people consider all the facts, then render an opinion. This is what we want to be, who we want to be.


Studying the Word of God helps the naive outgrow their simple-mindedness. Dig in and grow!


Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.

First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Foolishness: 1 Corinthians 1

In Summary: 1 Corinthians opens with the standard greeting of a letter from the Apostle Paul. He tells who he is with (Sosthenes) and who he is writing to. In this case, that is the “church of God that is in Corinth.” He further specifies that this church is made up of those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be saints. 
He then expresses the blessing/greeting of “grace and peace” from God. From there, Paul reflects on his initial involvement with the Corinthian people and the beginning of the church. After that, though, there are problems to deal with and Paul is not hesitant to address them. He begins by addressing the division within the church. Apparently, the church had split into factions, some of which were drawn to various personalities who had led the church in times past. There is no firm evidence, or even a suggestion, that Paul, Cephas, Apollos, or anyone else had asked for a faction in their name. Further, the “I follow Christ” faction may not have been any le…