Skip to main content

John 9:13-10:42 #eebc2018

John 9:13-10:42

We have a man who was born blind...and now he's not. That should spark the awe and wonder of the people and the religious leaders...and it does not. What do we do with that?

First, remember that the opening section of the reading goes with the earlier part of the chapter. You have to read John 9:1-12 so that you know who John 9:13 is referring to.

From there, we see the development of the story of this man. The Pharisees do not know how to handle the fact of his healing. Here is Jesus, violating their understanding of the Sabbath, healing a man. Which is not something that medicine could do--they knew full well that nothing in human means could heal someone born with blindness.

What do they do with that? Try to ignore it. That was all they could come up with, ignore what God had done.  Not the best approach.

We continue into John 10 and you can see what Jesus says here. He's talking about the unity of the flock, with Him as the Good Shepherd. There are callbacks here to Micah 2 and Psalm 118, and it's an illustration that everyone would have understood. The idea that someone would sacrifice himself for sheep? Sheep were plentiful...

Remember, though, that this is more about how good Jesus is and not primarily about us. Also, don't take the "other sheep" any farther than Gentiles.

Then Jesus attends the Jewish Feast of Dedication--this is what we now know as Hanukkah. The foundation of this feast is in the Maccabean Revolt of the 2nd century BC, and it's a history worth knowing. A good study Bible will have that in the "Time between the Testaments" section. A nerdy study Bible will call it "Intertestamental History." Take your pick.

The main thing we are seeing in this section is the growing division among the people about Jesus. They are soon to be forced to make a choice between Jesus and the way things have always been. The same choice that often confronts us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…