Skip to main content

Genesis 21:9-34 #eebc2018

We have a sad story to face today. During the celebration of Isaac's weaning, Ishmael, the son of Hagar, is seen to be mocking him. What does that mean? We actually don't really know. We can just see that Isaac's mother, Sarah, does not like what is being said.

It's clear, then, that it's not a simple brother-brother harassment. Sarah persuades Abraham to send Hagar away, but the "away" here is more of a death sentence than a relocation. The two are lost in the wilderness and likely to die. God intervenes and saves them.

What do we learn from that? I think there's a basic warning: Hagar has a child because Sarah suggested it. Now, Sarah's own actions come home to roost but she wants Hagar and Ishamel to bear the burden of it. We do the same thing at times: we make choices and then refuses to take the responsibility for what happens. Yet we are the ones who caused it. Be aware: your actions will have results, and you gain nothing by forcing others to carry your weight.

The rest of the reading looks at Abraham's relationship with Abimelech. Yes, Abimelech from Genesis 20. The two men are not exactly on the best of terms and there is conflict. It's over water, something that still brings conflict today.

At this point, the two men swear a covenant, that Abraham would not attack Abimelech, but we see Abraham's influence in his extracting promises from the ruler of the area. Think about that: Abimelech and Phicol are among the most powerful people in the region, and Abraham extracts a covenant with them as if between near-equals.

The point for us? God is on Abraham's side here, and Abimelech knows better than to mess with him. We should search the Word of God and see who the Lord has said are His...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…