Skip to main content

Genesis 11 #eebc2018

Well, the Tower of Babel is here. And, if you read Genesis 11 in the Christian Standard Bible (CSB), then you saw it labeled the Tower of Babylon. Well, actually, it’s never referred to in the text as the “Tower of” anything. They went to build a tower, and then city came to be called Babel, which can also be translated as Babylon. It’s on the plain called Shinar, which is Babylon. It’s also where the modern nation of Iraq is.

The story is fairly well-known, and worth revisiting briefly. What made the tower sinful? Was it the unity of mankind? Or their obstinate desire to stay together instead of fill the earth? Now, I’m of the opinion that Genesis 11:1-9 tells us what happened that led to the division and dispersion described in Genesis 10. We almost always (unless you’re in a Christopher Nolan movie) tell stories linearly—we would not start the Civil War with the Battle of Atlanta, then tell Vicksburg, the Antietam, then Gettysburg.

Ancient narratives are not bound by this linear habit. They are truthful and bound by clear statements, like “this happened, then this happened,” (or “Day 5, then Day 6”), but otherwise a summary can proceed a recapitulation—picture the news announcing that the Arkansas Razorbacks won the National Championship, then showing highlights. That’s my take on Genesis 11 and Genesis 10. (Singular events in history, like Razorback championships…)

So, what about the Tower? First, it was likely more of a pyramid or ziggurat than what we think of as a tower. Why? Engineering skills available at the time, that’s why. It’s an artificial mountain, basically.

What would make that sinful? Well, back up two chapters. God had judged sin through a flood. Through The Flood. But He promises to never flood all of everything again, so what’s the escape if there is some flooding? A mountain, right?

So if you want to evade responsibility to God, evade judgment, you need a mountain. And you build one…and God knows what you’re doing, and why. And He stops you, scatters you across the earth.

Then you find that multitudes of ancient people groups built…pyramids. They built artificial mountains. Think that’s an accident? Not likely. Bad ideas recur throughout history. Think we can find a way out of God’s judgment is a bad idea…and it’s one that recurs, often.

Now, a connection to the Tower of Babel (I grew with that label, so I’ll stick with it) that you need to make is to Acts 2. Why? One of the biggest obstacles to the spread of the Gospel is the inability to communicate across language barriers.Those barriers are the result of Babel—and Acts 2 shows the power of God to bridge those barriers. These days, we know there are people who need Jesus and we can plan ahead and learn languages, find translators. But in that first moment, God worked miraculously to spread the Gospel because God’s grace is amazing and begins to undo all the curse.

We then get the heritage of Abram as descended from Shem. Another point of note is the phrase in Genesis 11:10, translated by the CSB as “These are the family records of…” (Shem, here) is a recurring phrase in Genesis. It is possible that these were records preserved and in the possession of Moses, which he utilized under the guidance of God, to construct these parts of Genesis. Or they serve as section headings. (See more here)

But they definitely help outline Genesis. Watch for them as you read: Genesis 2:4; 5:1; 6:9; 10:1; 11:10;11:27; 25:12; 25:19; 36:1; 37:2. Be careful, always, searching for “hidden” meanings that require obscure knowledge, but remember that God speaks through words and phrases and sentences and paragraphs and sections—you get the point.

See you tomorrow, back in John!

More on Genesis 11 is here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…