Skip to main content

Book: What Works by @calthomas

This is the best politically-related book with a groundhog on the cover that I have ever read. It certainly supports the idea that groundhogs are conservative by nature, because otherwise I figure the groundhog would be attacking Cal Thomas instead of being happily photoshopped onto his shoulder. (I’m guessing it’s a composited photo, since there are separate credits for the author pic and the groundhog pic.)

I’m not here to deal with photography, though, I’m supposed to look at the content of What Works: Common Sense Solutions for a Stronger America. So, let’s move on from the cover shot…or the tagline of “It’s groundhog day in Washington.” At least Thomas has settled on our government being locked on February 2. I’m pretty sure they’re all locked on April 1.

First and foremost, if you do not know Thomas’ political views, he’s conservative. Very conservative. If you hold the opposing views, you will most likely not like this book, nor will you like this review. I happen to think most of Thomas’ political viewpoint makes sense, so if you think the government should tax everyone into identical incomes to provide identical lives for everyone, you’ll dislike me, this review, and this book pretty solidly.

If you are a fan of Thomas, you’re aware of his writing style. He’s a newspaper columnist, which basically prefigures the modern blogger: you have to hit the point, hit it memorably, and hit it short. The difference in columnists and bloggers is this: any idiot can blog, but there are limited spots for columnists, so you have to be good at it to do it for a living.

Thomas has been good at it for nearly 30 years. What Works ends up reading like a string of columns organized by topic and concept. This is logical, but it does result in a few places of repetition. Additionally, the brevity lends itself to telling the preferred side of any given story or statistic. Citing one liners from speeches of past Presidents, for example, makes good points, but loses the context of the speech. And that says nothing of the context of history: what portions of President Coolidge’s economic policies contributed to the Great Depression? Yet we see Coolidge cited favorably at some points.

Of course, grasping what points the citations are is hampered by the use of the dreaded ENDNOTE instead of the blessed FOOTNOTE! As always, it’s hard to know if the author is responsible for that, but I will absolutely fuss about any nonfiction book that forces me to flip back and forth to check references.

In all, Thomas is very clear in his writing. He presents his conservative viewpoint and how he thinks they would benefit America. His views are not those of either party—certainly one knows he disagrees with the bulk of the Democratic Party platform—but he also has no use for the Republican participation in expanding the government.

This is a great book for those who are looking for a clear expression of conservative ideas. It’s a good book for those who are open-mindedly examining various views of the future of this country. If you’re not a fan of pro-American writing that thinks we’ve had great days before and that we are capable of great days ahead, you’ll want to skip it.

As to the ideas? I will say this: many of the problems we face have been tackled by more and more government spending over the past 5 decades, and it hasn’t worked. Maybe we should try less government instead…

I like this book, but I can see how it’s a case of confirmation bias: Thomas espouses what I think. He’s pro-life, pro-gun, pro-small government. If you’re not, you might just hate this book as much as I like it.

I received a copy of this book from HarperCollins in exchange for the review.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Abraham Lincoln Quoted by Jesus! Mark 3

Mark records a curious event in his third chapter (link). If you look at Mark 3:25, you'll see that Jesus quotes the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. After all, one of the highlights of the Lincoln years is his famous speech regarding slavery in the United States where he used the phrase that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." This speech was given in 1858 when he accepted the nomination to run against Stephen A. Douglas for Senate, but is still remembered as the defining speech regarding slaveholding in the United States. I recall being taught in school how brilliant and groundbreaking the speech was, how Lincoln had used such wise words to convey his thought. Yet the idea was not original to Lincoln. Rather, it was embedded in Lincoln from his time reading the Bible. Now, I have read varying reports about Lincoln's personal religious beliefs: some place him as a nearly completely committed Christian while others have him somewh…

Independence Day 2017

I don’t know if Thomas Paine will be aggrieved that I paste his thoughts from Common Sense here, from the electronic edition. It’s a Public Domain work at this point, so hopefully none will be bothered that I am not paying for it...I think there is value in seeing the underlying reasons of Independence. I find a couple of things noteworthy in his introduction:First, he speaks of those who disagree and, while calling those out, holds the strength of his affirmative argument will be enough to straighten them out. We could do well to think more like that.Second, his final sentence should be a required view: the influence of reason and principle. Not self-interest masquerading as principle. Not party propaganda disguised as reason.That being said, not everything Paine said is right. If he and I lived at the same time, we’d argue religion over a great deal. However, the idea of “natural rights of man” follows from the idea of humanity as a special creation—that all are created equal and en…