Skip to main content

Dead to me!

We use that phrase in American culture to express our displeasure with someone.  We simply announce that "he's dead to me" and then proceed to ignore or downplay anything that person does.  It's an amplification of the junior high tactic of not speaking to someone.

There was, in times past, a very real sense in which people treated the living as dead as a form of passing judgment on them.  People were treated as if dead for marrying badly, choosing certain professions their family found distasteful, or even taking the wrong side in politics.  It's no way to treat another human being.  Really and truly.

Nothing in Scripture allows Christians to treat other people that way.  However, we are to act as if we are dead to certain things.  It's the opposite of our cultural behavior where we expect others to do the dying for us.  We are the ones that need to choose to die.

One of the things we need to die to is sin.  That's what Paul is referring to in Romans 6:1-4.  Sin will not roll over and die for us.  There's really no way we can kill it ourselves, but we do have the option to die ourselves.  Fortunately, we don't have to literally die, but instead that we are to identify with Christ in His death.

You see, we can't honestly expect for the temptations of this world to leave us alone.  We can't expect the old habits of our sinful nature to leave us alone.  What we have to do is be so dead as not to heed them.  The difficulty, though, is that often we try to die to sin without being alive to something else.  It's a way that our materialistic philosophy has penetrated our Christian behavior.  (note: we're not talking Madonna Materialism here.  Philosophically, materialism isn't about getting more stuff, it's that the stuff is all there is, that if something is unseen or unquantifiable, it doesn't exist.  This leads to the behavior of materialism where, since stuff is all there is, we try to get lots o'stuff.)  Materialism as a philosophy holds that after death, there's nothing.

Biblical philosophy (for that matter, most religious philosophy) teaches us the opposite: that there is much more after death than we see here.  Death is the ending of one thing, but the beginning of another.  We Christians believe that physical death is just the beginning of eternity.  Yet we try and "die to sin" without living to something else.

We've got to learn to live after our death.  After we die to sin, we have to learn to live to God's glory.  All of our pursuits, all of our energy, time, finances should be focused in that direction.  Is it?

So many of us try to live to both sin and to Christ, and yet it's clearly impossible to do so.  This is the source of our frustration as followers of Christ: we have to choose, which world do we want to live in?  We need to choose to go ahead and live as dead to this world.

 

Doug

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Heart Mender by @andyandrews (Andy Andrews)

The Heart Mender: A Story of Second ChancesEver read a book that you just kind of wish is true?  That's my take on The Heart Mender by Andy Andrews.  It's a charming story of love and forgiveness, and it's woven into the historical setting of World War II America.  For the narrative alone, the book is worth the read, but the message it contains is well worth absorbing as well.However, let's drop back a minute.  This book was originally published under the title Island of Saints.  I read Island of Saints and enjoyed it greatly.  Now, Andrews has released it under a new title, with a few minor changes.  All of this is explained in the Author's Note at the beginning, but should be noted for purchaser's sake.  If you read Island of Saints, you're rereading when you read The Heart Mender.  Now, go ahead and reread it.  It will not hurt you one bit.Overall, the story is well-paced.  There are points where I'd like more detail, both in the history and the geog…

Curiosity and the Faithlife Study Bible

Good morning! Today I want to take a look at the NIV Faithlife Study Bible. Rather than spend the whole post on this particular Study Bible, I’m going to hit a couple of highlights and then draw you through a few questions that I think this format helps with.



First, the basics of the NIV Faithlife Study Bible (NIVFSB, please): the translation is the 2011 New International Version from Biblica. I’m not the biggest fan of that translation, but that’s for another day. It is a translation rather than a paraphrase, which is important for studying the Bible. Next, the NIVFSB is printed in color. Why does that matter? This version developed with Logos Bible Software’s technology and much of the “study” matter is transitioning from screen to typeface. The graphics, maps, timelines, and more work best with color. Finally, you’ve got the typical “below-the-line” running notes on the text. Most of these are explanations of context or highlights of parallels, drawing out the facts that we miss by …

Foolishness: 1 Corinthians 1

In Summary: 1 Corinthians opens with the standard greeting of a letter from the Apostle Paul. He tells who he is with (Sosthenes) and who he is writing to. In this case, that is the “church of God that is in Corinth.” He further specifies that this church is made up of those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be saints. 
He then expresses the blessing/greeting of “grace and peace” from God. From there, Paul reflects on his initial involvement with the Corinthian people and the beginning of the church. After that, though, there are problems to deal with and Paul is not hesitant to address them. He begins by addressing the division within the church. Apparently, the church had split into factions, some of which were drawn to various personalities who had led the church in times past. There is no firm evidence, or even a suggestion, that Paul, Cephas, Apollos, or anyone else had asked for a faction in their name. Further, the “I follow Christ” faction may not have been any le…