tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-989769941716521546.post3898113618255148209..comments2023-05-31T11:01:38.850-05:00Comments on Learning, Teaching, and Laughing: Sermon January 16 Galatians 1:1Doug Hibbardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01099486048716032843noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-989769941716521546.post-32207204372351735482011-01-18T17:00:31.891-06:002011-01-18T17:00:31.891-06:00I probably have several meds that I should be taki...I probably have several meds that I should be taking. <br /><br />On the "sermon forum" front, I think I've imagined a group of 4 to 6, and just tackling one person's message each week. For example, you would submit your outline at the end of this week, then the audio, and we'd discuss you on Monday or Tuesday. The next guy would then be the next weekend. Everyone would get the benefit of 4 or 5 impartial hearers each week. Do it asynchronously rather than live chat so that it can fit more readily into our diverse schedules.<br /><br />I'm not sure it's a marvelous idea, but it's a way to set up encouragement (and accountability) with fellow preachers. It would remove the concern of competition by being so spread out. There's several bugs to be thought through, but it could be helpful.Doug Hibbardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01099486048716032843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-989769941716521546.post-20437002137051001852011-01-18T10:51:18.033-06:002011-01-18T10:51:18.033-06:00Great idea. Personally, I'd suggest splitting...Great idea. Personally, I'd suggest splitting forum members into groups of no more than 4. At roughly 30min per sermon, that would mean each person has to spend around 3 hours listening to three sermons (1.5hrs) and evaluating them (another 1-1.5hrs). You don't get as much broad feedback, but then if I had to listen to 10 sermons I'd never get it done.<br /><br />Ideally I would think it'd be neat if groups happened to be preaching the same text (or have past sermons from the same text). It'd be interesting to hear the different insights and provide a level-playing field of comparison.<br /><br />Anyway, your sermon was good. I haven't heard you before, so if it works I say keep the meds going :-DAnthony Russohttp://www.throwawayeverything.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-989769941716521546.post-29146068173990714622011-01-17T18:47:18.802-06:002011-01-17T18:47:18.802-06:00Glad you enjoyed it. I was so lost on cold/cough ...Glad you enjoyed it. I was so lost on cold/cough medications that I have no idea if it was good or coherent.<br /><br />I'm still thinking we need something like an online preaching forum where we post audio and outline and evaluate each other for helpful reasons. Not the snarkiness that is the typical preaching class discussion, but genuine helpfulness to each other. Praise when due, criticism when due.Doug Hibbardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01099486048716032843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-989769941716521546.post-38231052359062796542011-01-17T13:49:00.822-06:002011-01-17T13:49:00.822-06:00Took a listen while putting a desk together at hom...Took a listen while putting a desk together at home. Really enjoyed it! Love the depth you gave to just "Paul,". I'm a junkie for getting the mail too. :-)Anthony Russohttp://www.throwawayeverything.comnoreply@blogger.com